Comparison Tool

TPG vs Warburg Pincus vs Carlyle Group

Side-by-side comparison of fund managers. Analyze AUM, strategy, health scores, team size, and track record.

MetricTPGWarburg PincusCarlyle Group
AUM$220B$82000.0T$420B
Primary StrategyReal EstateVenture CapitalReal Estate
HeadquartersUnited StatesUSUnited States
Founded199219661987
EmployeesN/AN/AN/A
Investment ProfessionalsN/AN/AN/A
Ownershippublicindependentpublic
Outside StakeYesNoYes
Stakeability Score55%59%59%
Team Stability41%41%41%
Growth Score58%54%75%
Funds Tracked32864163
Avg Fund IRR14.2%15.0%10.4%
Websitehttps://www.tpg.comhttps://www.warburgpincus.comhttps://www.carlyle.com

Which GP is better for your portfolio?

The right GP depends on your investment objectives, risk tolerance, and portfolio construction needs. Consider strategy fit, track record consistency, team stability, and alignment of interests when evaluating managers. GP Stakes provides comprehensive data to support your due diligence process.

For Capital Preservation

Look for higher team stability scores, longer track records, and established institutional relationships.

For Growth Exposure

Prioritize growth scores, recent fund vintage performance, and hiring activity signals.

For GP Stakes Investment

Focus on stakeability scores, ownership structure, AUM growth trajectory, and fee revenue stability.

Need Deeper Analysis?

Get access to detailed health scores, fund-level performance, and proprietary stakeability metrics.

Get Full Access